|
The field of peatland restoration is currently attracting a lot of
scientific interest worldwide, as attempts are being made to restore
damaged peatlands and protect what little of the resource remains.
(Heathwaite et al 1993).
There is within the scientific literature a body of knowledge gathered
from restoration projects on how to undertake peatland rehabilitation.
Many of these are long term monitoring projects with information being
constantly updated. In comparison with the rest of Europe, little research
has been carried out in Ireland, despite it possessing the largest
peat resource.
The restoration of Glenullin Bog would be possible using existing knowledge.
The restoration would be a long term project with a series of defined
stages of development.
All stages of the restoration should be scientifically monitored.
The information gathered would be an invaluable record of the effectiveness
of the methods of restoration used, the time periods involved and provide
an evaluation of the suitability of these methods for the restoration
in Irish raised bogs of this type. It is envisaged that as the restoration
continued, new methods would be developed through practical observations
and scientific trials.
The scientific value of Glenullin Bog for this kind of research cannot
be understated.
| Suitability of Glenullin Raised Bog for Restoration |
Glenullin Bog has the following components which enhance its suitability
for restoration.
1. The surface of the bog remains saturated to a few centimetres of
the surface despite the recent drainage attempts.
2. The hydrology of the site is contained within a single unit and
easily controllable as detailed in the hydrological report. The water
table could be raised without any associated effect in the surrounding
agricultural land.
3. The surface layers of the bog consist or poorly hummified peat
derived from the disturbed acrotelm. This material is ideal for the
restoration of bogs, as it has a high water retaining capacity which
allows the Sphagnum species to develop without desiccation.
4. The gross morphology of the site remains intact with the cupola
still in place with a high water table and pronounced dome. Also present
are remnants of lagg fens adjacent to the Glenullin Water.
5. The surface vegetation has already begun to recolonise the bare
peat from material left in situ after removal of vegetation. The low
cover of Calluna vulgaris and the presence of Eriophorum angustifolium
gives an indication of the continued wetness of the site. The high
incidence of small regenerating Sphagnum hummocks of many different
species, including S. magellanicum, is further evidence of the overall
health of the site and its suitability for full restoration.
6. There is some evidence of the remnant micro-morphology of the site,
(pool structure). Shallow remnant pools can be identified on the cupola
where Narthecium ossifragum and Eriophorum angustifolium are regenerating.
7. There is a large local genetic resource available in the cut-away
areas of the bog. These contain most of the plant species one would
expect to find on an undamaged bog surface. They also act as reserves
for the fauna of the site. The other bogs within the valley have been
more extensively cut-over than Glenullin Bog, but these would also
act as sources for the flora and fauna moving onto the restored bog.
These sites are likely to contain species no longer found on Glenullin
Bog due to the recent damage.
| Suggested Stages of Restoration |
1. The blocking of all drains on the surface of the bog. This should
be carried out by the use of dams every few feet to form pools. There
is material available for this on the surface of the bog.
2. A full hydrological investigation:
a. The mapping of the water table and the establishment of phreatic
monitoring points on the bog.
b. The determination of inputs and outputs to the hydrological system
and the calculation of the full hydrological budget of the site.
3. The mapping, by probing the peat mass, of the mineral ground beneath
the bog to establish the extent of the moraine ridges which could
be acting as hydrological dams.
4. The raising of the water table to maintain it at the surface level
of the bog by the sluicing of certain selected hydrological output
points using information gathered in the above surveys.
5. The possible seeding of the site with plant material (notably Sphagnum
species) collected from the cuttings. The pools created by blocking
the drains are particularly suitable for this kind of active regeneration.
6. The contouring of the bog surface to enhance regeneration. This
can include the creation of shallow pools ‘scooped’ on
the surface.
7. The removal of any old, dry hummified peat such as that associated
with old turf banks. This could include the continuation of some of
the old turbary banks in a directed and sustainable manner to enhance
the overall ecological value of the site.
8. The long term monitoring of all the activities is recommended with
the establishment of fixed flora and fauna monitoring points. Photographic
monitoring of the vegetation recovery is also recommended.
9. A Community approach is envisaged with benefits to education, scientific
research and the local economy from tourist related activities.
| Report Summary and Conclusions |
1. Glenullin raised bog is an ombrotrophic peatland of a type which
is structurally and botanically unique to Ireland. Examples of this
type with an intact gross morphology are now rare in Ireland due to
peat extraction.
2. Glenullin Bog possesses a near intact cupola and a remnant of a
lagg fen.
3. It has retained a high and stable water table despite attempts
to drain it for peat extraction.
4. Owing to the continued wetness of the site, regeneration of the
vegetation has occurred since the surface vegetation was removed.
5. Restoration should be actively managed and rigourously monitored.
The information obtained would be an invaluable addition to the science
of peatland rehabilitation.
6. The cutaway area around the bog has acted as a refuge for the flora
and fauna formerly found on the cupola. These areas enhance the value
of the site considerably.
7. The site has previously been used for paleocological studies. Loss
of the cupola due to peat extraction would remove a valuable reference
site.
8. The bog is an intrinsic landscape feature within Glenullin which
is appreciated by the local population. Removal of the bog would destroy
the central feature of the valley and significantly reduce its aesthetic
and tourist value.
For the reasons summarised above the halting of peat extraction followed
by a full restoration of the bog as outlined in this report is recommended.
|